Thought Leaders, by definition, play a valuable role in helping to shape our perspectives. It’s not that they have all the answers. But they can serve as a catalyst for new thinking. The very best ones will challenge our world view, reframing our old paradigms and giving us new tools to attack long-standing problems.
As Ecosys continues to explore the many challenges of our Education ecosystem, we see value in “checking-in” to those insights.
Our discussions can’t help but be enriched and further informed.
Tonight, WEDS 10/6 at 9pET, we will look to the work of Clay Christensen in “Disrupting Class” (2008) to discuss his deep and thought provoking insights on social innovation, in the specific context of public education.
Click here to join the conversation.
It’s worth noting that Christensen’s heavily circulated work on ‘disruptive innovation’ (which we’ll discuss) is not limited to education, but also areas like healthcare. This is significant, because our foundational ecosys framing shares a similar broad base. The thought process? Large, complex, interdependent ecosystems of people and organizations have trouble working resolving conflict. The larger and more mature the ecosystem, the more deeply the traditional beliefs and paradigms are held. Environments and social realities change, but often, the ‘system’ struggles to keep pace.
We can’t do justice to “Disrupting Class” or disruptive innovation in one 2 hour chat. But let’s try to get our arms around the following main points.
Q1 Learning Intelligences & Custom Learning (ch. 1)
- Is there consensus on different learning styles & intelligences per Howard Gardner (80’s)?
- To what degree are the benefits/advantages of custom learning embraced?
Q2 The “Factory Model” of Public Education (ch. 1)
- Want to discuss foundations of the standards movement in historical context, fueled by rapidly expanding populations. Over the ensuing decades, what has scaled? And what hasn’t?
Q3 Textbooks & the Establishment (ch. 5, 7)
- It seems important that uncovering prevailing paradigms & understand resistance to change, per Kuhn (60’s)
- Is there an appetite for evolving how teachers teach (“coaches”, “content architects”), and how students learn?
Q4 Disruptive Innovation (ch. 3, 4)
- Christensen suggests local innovation focus where there is no prevailing competition. Do his target examples resonate? (Pre-K, home school, tutoring, AP, credit recovery, special needs)
- Is “student-centered” learning viable and what is the potential of technology to enable this?
Q5 Framing Success (p. 185-190)
- Engagement is critical, because “where people are plotting change, they are often talking past each other”. Agree? How do we get there?
- Need common solution language, so we must “negotiate” and use diverse change tools – to coerce, guide & inspire (as appropriate)
Do Christensen’s perspectives resonate with your experience?
We’ll spend 20 minutes framing and discussing each of the above 5 topics tonight, and will capture what can be captured in our wiki. There will certainly be more to come after that.
RESULTS OF THIS CHAT ARE POSTED ON THE ECOSYS WIKI, HERE.
While this is just the inception of our Thought Leader series, you can probably tell from our framing how much work lies ahead.
As always, we’re up to the challenge.
We hope you’ll join our conversation.